Chevy Cruze vs. Toyota Corolla: Compare Cars

Despite the surging popularity of utility vehicles, today’s small sedans are do-it-alls. They’re practically mid-size these days, and the top entrants still sell hundreds of thousands of units a year. And each new entrant offers better safety, nicer interiors, and features that equal and sometimes outdo pricier rivals.

The Toyota Corolla has long been the sales champ among compact sedans, but it’s now five years old. The Chevy Cruze is brand-new this year, and better than it’s ever been. To shoppers looking for value, reliability, and comfort around $20,000, which is the better choice: the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze or the 2016 Toyota Corolla?

This year, the Cruze is our winner, though both vehicles are likely to do very well in this highly competitive segment.

MORE: Read our 2016 Toyota Corolla review and 2016 Chevrolet Cruze review

For 2016, the handsome, wedge-shaped profile of the redesigned Cruze makes it look crisper and more modern than its three-box predecessor with its slab sides. The many curves, angles, and accent lines mostly work well together, though from a few angles, they border on the busy. The main surprise is that the Cruze looks startlingly like the Volt plug-in hybrid hatchback, though that car’s starting price is $15,000 more, and though its high-quality materials and intuitive controls set it apart.

When the Toyota Corolla was last redesigned for 2012, its look was less vanilla, more daring and edgy. That’s a long time ago, though, and it’s now back to the vanilla end of the scale—where Corollas traditionally resided. Its front end is distinctive, but despite side accent lines, it’s instantly pegged as a compact Toyota sedan. A sporty Corolla SE adds blacked-out trim and other pseudo-racy details, while high-end models get LED headlamps for an upscale finishing touch.

The new Cruze offers only a single engine, a 153-horsepower, 1.4-liter turbocharged inline-4. It delivers EPA fuel-economy ratings of 35 mpg combined with the 6-speed automatic transmission that’ll be by far the most common choice.

Most Corollas are powered by a 132-horsepower 1.8-liter inline-4, with a continuously variable transmission (CVT) that responds well to most types of predictable driving. If maximum fuel efficiency is the criterion, the Corolla LE Eco model uses a specially tuned version of that engine. Still, while its rated gas mileage of 35 mpg combined was high five years ago, it’s par for the course these days.

Performance and utility

The Cruze isn’t a sport sedan, and doesn’t come across as particularly eager or tossable. But its absorbent ride is taut enough to avoid bobbly handling and its steering is nicely weighted. As always, the ride is best with the smallest 15- or 16-inch wheels, which require taller sidewalls on the tires than the pricier, larger, and rougher-riding 17- or 18-inch options.

Most Corolla models, on the other hand, are a bit too springy and pillowy, and the steering is far too light for anything but demure driving. They’re what they’ve always been: predictable, competent, and unexciting. The sportier Corolla SE has suspension tuning closer to that of a sport sedan—with a Sport button that firms up the steering, and a ride that’s nicely damped and absorbs bumps well despite its stiffer cornering.

The Chevy offer substantial interior room for front passengers, with more usable space for rear-seaters than its predecessor. It’s relatively large inside, with nicely bolstered front bucket seats and adequate rear-seat leg room. Both are strong on storage space, too. Its interior materials are stylish and don’t appear to have been built to a price.

The Toyota, too offers, real, usable seating space, with enough back-seat leg room in particular to make it large enough for adults. The materials and trim were impressive for such a high-volume car when it launched, but the rest of the segment has caught up to it now. Still, the carmaker put a lot of effort into the Corolla interior, and it doesn’t shout “rental car” as previous versions did.

Safety and features

The winner in safety remains to be seen. As a new model, the Cruze hasn’t been fully crash-tested yet, but it offers active-safety systems like blind-spot monitors, lane-keeping assist, and forward-collision warnings. It’s missing two optional features found on some competitors in the segment: adaptive cruise control and automatic emergency braking.

The Corolla earns a 5-star overall safety score from the NHTSA, but only a “Marginal” score on the new IIHS small-overlap frontal crash test added a few years ago, along with the top rating of “Good” on all other IIHS tests. It doesn’t offer every electronic active-safety feature either.

Across the lineup, the 2016 Cruze will include a standard rearview camera and a 7.0-inch MyLink touchscreen system with standard Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility. It offers navigation, as well as heated leather seats and automatic climate control, on high-end models.

All Corollas come with standard with air conditioning, Bluetooth pairing, LED low-beam headlights with LED daytime running lights, in-glass AM/FM antenna, color-keyed outside mirrors and door handles, a 60/40 split fold-down rear seat, and power locks, doors, and mirrors.

The new 2016 Cruze is our winner, thanks primarily to newer styling and better performance, both in acceleration and when it comes to ride and handling. Its standard fuel economy matches the best that the Corolla Eco model can muster, and it has a fresher set of equipment. The Corolla is always a safe choice for reliability and resale value, but the Cruze for now is simply a better car.


Follow The Car Connection on Facebook and Twitter.

Source link