Subcompact Crossover Comparison: HR-V, Renegade, Juke, Soul, and CX-3

You can always count on more change, though, and a new crop of even smaller boxes is bringing a bit of excitement to the party. This group of so-called “subcompact crossovers”—including the 2015 Kia Soul, the 2015 Jeep Renegade, the 2016 Honda HR-V, the 2016 Mazda CX-3, and the 2015 Nissan Juke—is not boring. Though they’re all based on subcompact car chassis, no one formula for this type of car has yet emerged as the one to beat (that is, copy). A broad range of powertrain setups and sizes, in addition to glaringly different personalities, keeps things interesting.

We gathered this group to decide which one we’d most like to park in our garage. Lacking a clear rubric to grade vehicles in this fresh segment, we simply did what we do best: Drive too fast, fiddle with every button and touchscreen, and pile into every back seat. These being (or at least claiming to be) utility vehicles, we also made sure to load them every which way with all manner of stuff. Here’s how they stack up:

5. Jeep Renegade

+Distinctive, rugged appearance

+Nicely finished interior

+More off-road capable than the others

-Lazy, slow-shifting transmission

-Expensive

-Poor fuel economy

But if you’re looking for a small crossover for any practical purpose, you can do better. The 2.4-liter four-cylinder is thrashy, and the nine-speed automatic makes the engine’s 180 horsepower unavailable most of the time. “It takes so long to shift I could time it in minutes,” complained daily news editor Jake Holmes. On the bright side, we do like the Renegade’s steering, and its relatively planted ride and handling make it feel far less tippy than you’d think given its 66.5-inch overall height (nearly half a foot taller than the diminutive Mazda).

There isn’t as much space inside the tall, boxy body as we expected. We couldn’t fit a bike in without taking the front wheel off, as the narrow cargo opening and high liftover height make it difficult to use the entirety of the relatively capacious 50.8 cubic feet of space (with the seats folded). At least that space is nicely trimmed, with a pleasing color scheme and plenty of cutesy Easter eggs that play up the Jeep brand’s heritage.

The Jeep also returns poor fuel economy considering its size. It can’t even manage 30 mpg on the highway, which is less surprising when you realize it weighs 400 to 500 pounds more than the lightest in this group, the Mazda and the Kia. As senior editor David Zenlea said, “When you strip away the Jeep charm, you’re left with a fat, unrefined Fiat.”

4. Nissan Juke

+Punchy turbo engine

+Sporty, responsive handling

+ Offbeat styling (if you like it)

-Offbeat styling (if you hate it)

-Small inside

-Dated interior

The spunky styling is also backed up by some real verve: We’re fans of the punchy, 188-hp turbocharged four-cylinder, which combines with a responsive CVT (yes, there is such a thing) to provide strong mid-range torque. The handling is fun, too. “The Juke has a nimble, tossable feel to it, and the steering is precise and accurate,” noted daily news editor Eric Weiner.

The Juke’s age starts to show on the inside, where the tiny touchscreen and subpar plastics remind us too much of a ratty old subcompact. And yet the Nissan still costs $28,225, the second-highest here, and lacks active safety features such as the blind-spot monitors found on the Mazda, the Jeep, and the Kia. The cabin isn’t completely devoid of party tricks, though—we delighted our friends with the center stack buttons that magically switch from climate controls to drive-mode switches on command, and the 360-degree camera view is useful in parking lots.

The Juke has never been easy to categorize, and its appeal defies its low ranking. If space is not your highest priority and you like the look, the Juke will still put a smile on your face.

3. Honda HR-V

+Cavernous, configurable interior

+Strong value for money

+Smooth ride

-Sluggish CVT

-Outdated, unintuitive touchscreen

-Uninspired styling

Up for anything, that is, except for having fun. The powertrain is a letdown, with an unresponsive CVT that’s loath to let the 1.8-liter four-cylinder rev anywhere near its torque peak. “Lots of unrefined noise without much acceleration in return,” senior editor David Zenlea said. Light steering helps with parking-lot maneuverability but combines with the soft suspension for lazy, boring driving. It’s hard to believe this is based on the zippy Honda Fit. To its credit, the HR-V does provide a comfortable, composed ride, and matches the Mazda for the best fuel economy ratings of the bunch.

The Honda also offers good value. Our loaded, all-wheel-drive EX-L model comes in at $26,750, the second-cheapest in this group, and comes with features such as navigation, heated seats, a sunroof, and Honda’s blind-spot camera system. However, all this good sense is spoiled by a frustrating touch-sensitive interface. The counterintuitive infotainment screen unnecessarily complicates tasks as simple as adjusting the stereo volume. What happened to Honda’s commitment to simple, easy-to-use interiors? The dashboard’s sleek look certainly isn’t worth the compromise in usability, especially considering it comes in such a bland package.

If you’re dead-set on an HR-V and its class-leading practicality, it’s best to forgo the EX-L’s extra features and choose the base LX model, which has more traditional controls and can be had with a stick.

2. Mazda CX-3

+Crisp, fun handling

+Sharp design inside and out

+High-quality interior materials

-Cramped rear seat

-Tiny, impractical cargo area

-Limited outward visibility

Yet for all those objective shortcomings, Mazda’s smallest crossover overdelivers on just about every subjective category. It drives better than any other car in this comparison and looks sharp enough inside and out to warrant a premium badge. And unlike the other fashion-first vehicle in this test, the Renegade, it has the substance to back up its style. Its sophistication is evident in everything from the quick-shifting automatic transmission and the accurate steering to the solid-feeling infotainment control knob, which wouldn’t be out of place in a Mercedes-Benz. “I’d rather go to a job interview driving this than any of the others,” said photographer Patrick Hoey. For all that, the Mazda is still affordable to buy and operate. Our well-equipped Grand Touring model costs $27,120 and gets impressive fuel economy even with all-wheel drive.

What to make of such a good car that happens to be a terrible crossover? Zenlea likened the CX-3 to a sort of budget alternative to the Range Rover Evoque, pointing out that the Mazda is “expressly designed to look unconventional, not to be utilitarian.” This stylish, sporty little box is certainly likable, but more than any of its competitors—even the silly Juke—it makes us ask, “Why?” Unless the CX-3’s crisp styling and all-wheel drive are must-haves, you’re better off buying a cheaper, more efficient, and just as fun-to-drive Mazda3 hatchback.

1. Kia Soul

+Swanky interior with lots of kit

+Comfortable rear seat

+Refined ride and powertrain

-No AWD option

-No handling verve

-So-so fuel economy

One major shortcoming for some will be the Soul’s lack of optional all-wheel drive. Kia officials say it’s coming. In the meantime, this Michigan-based staff is confident that with a good set of winter tires, there are few places this high-riding front-wheel-drive box won’t be able to take you.

You’ll definitely have cash leftover for tires because the Kia is the cheapest car in our test (and would remain so even if you were to add a hypothetical $1,500 for all-wheel drive). It’s paradoxically one of the best equipped. For our test car’s price of $24,750, you get a heaping load of luxury features, including a panoramic sunroof, a heated steering wheel, heated and cooled front seats, and heated rear seats. It’s all thoughtfully arranged and handsomely appointed. “Not only is the infotainment system useful, clear, and attractive, there is handsome stitching and leather all over,” noted Weiner.

All in all, the Soul looks and feels like something more than just a little car, which is, we suspect, the most important point in this young segment.